Skip to main content

What is Agile Testing?

So, what is this Agile Testing? It’s kind of fancy term and everybody use it in software development and QA world, but do we really understand it? What is different in agile approach to testing than in classic ones?

I will try to highlight core concepts, that stands for Agile Testing approach. Please don’t consider this as any kind of manifesto, rather that I want to summarize list of good practices for testers and QAs working in agile teams.

Continuous Quality 

We’ll look down on whats’s in my opinion the most important part of the concept. In stardard – let’s say – waterfall aproach, testing is just another step in the process. When development is done, here comes the test stage, and usually some kind of QA branch is responsible for testing the product of preceding development stage. This approach have been prove correct in case of large systems, with stable and well know requirements. 

However, today’s way of delivering software differs from this. There is huge demand for networkbased, distributed systems, delivered as quick as it’s possible. Going further, business requirements tend to change more often. As well as software development methodologies changed, turning into lighter, agile methodologies like Scrum or Kanban, software testing needs to change also. There’s no room for separate stage. Rather that, testing should be done at each stage of the process.

Gathering Requirements: Starting from gathering requirements, ones should validate them in terms of consistent, logic or comprehensibility. 

Development: Through the development stage, testers should continuously test smaller pieces of the feature, working close (or pair) with developers. 

Testing: During dedicated test time, features needs to be validated in terms of acceptance requirements. I believe our role here is to be bridge between product owners and developers, checking correctness of the implementation with business guidelines. 

Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment: Nowadays, when software delivery introduced CI/CD and DevOps, there’s huge demand for test automation. I’m far from saying that manual testing is dead and I think will never be, but in my opinion – test automation is the future, whereas manual testing would become limited verification of some narrow test cases. Having said that, automated test should be part of the CI/CD pipelines. Of course there is no need to run for eg. all selenium acceptance tests (which are usually slow) while building every pull request, and in those cases we can limit automated test scope to unit and integration test. However, full blown test suite should trigger at least once a day, could be in separate job, and also ideally before every deploy on production. 

Maintenance: Obviously, bugs will always happen – also when our feature is on production. Depending on organization of your company, usually product owners are the ones who enter them to backlog. Role of the tester here is to analyse bug reports and provide product owners necessary technical knowledge, to make issues fully understandable both to business and developers.


IT is a domain that constantly needs to adapt to more and more demanding industry requirements. Agile movement have had huge impact on software development, like so on testing and quality assurance. In order to test well and deliver reliable software, we also need to adapt to these needs, and improve our work methodology. In my opinion the key concept of agile testing is to treat testing not as a stage that start and ends with a test stage, but as a continuous process.

Popular posts from this blog

REST-Assured framework overview

In modern software development, REST services becomes most popular choice for implementing distributed and scalable web application. They are light and easy to maintain, which results in faster and more effective implementation and system integration.
I recommend you also my other posts about REST-Assured and building microservice’s test automation frameworks: REST-Assured: going deeperBuilding microservices testing framework
With the increase popularity of RESTful services, there is a need for fast and lightweight tool for REST webservices testing automation. One of the most popular choice is Rest-Assured framework from Jayway. It introduces simplicity of testing web services from dynamic languages like groovy or ruby to java. In this post we will get our hands dirty and write automatic test in Rest-Assured framework.
In order to create complete implementation of automated tests in Rest-Assured framework, we need to write our code against some example API. We’ll use standalone Wiremock m…

Testing Asynchronous APIs: Awaitility tutorial

Despite the growing popularity of test automation, most of it is still likely to be done on the frontend side of application. While GUI is a single layer that puts all the pieces together, focusing your automation efforts on the backend side requires dealing with distributed calls, concurrency, handling their diversity and integration.
Backend test automation is especially popular in the microservices architecture, with testing REST API’s. I’ve noticed that dealing with asynchronous events is particularly considered as challenging. In this article I want to cover basic usage of Awaitility – simple java library for testing asynchronous events. All the code examples are written in groovy and our REST client is Rest-Assured.
Synchronous vs Asynchronous In simple words, synchronous communication is when the API calls are dependent and their order matters, while asynchronous communication is when the API calls are independent. Quoting Apigee definition:
Synchronous  If an API call is synchrono…

Notes after TestingCup 2018

On May 28-29th I attended TestingCup conference in Łódź. Having quite unique perspective: this was my second year in row as a Speaker at this conference I want to share some thoughts on the event. Dust has settled, lets go! 

Championship Originally TestingCup is a software testing championship. Wait, what? Yes, the formula is unique: teams and individuals from all around Poland are competing in finding the most bugs and defects in specially prepared application - Mr. Buggy. I don’t have specific data, but since this year’s conference was all english I guess competitors were not only from Poland. As a spectator, I must say that the whole competition looked very professional. There were team shirts and names, podium and trophies (gold cup and cash). 
Some cons? Testing championship is held at the first day of the conference. So this is already a conference, but if you’re not taking part in the championship… there’s not much to do, since all the talks are in the next day. Organizers are aw…